a. the impartiality requirement in section 6 of the Public Administration Act has been breached b. some other administrative error has been made and the possibility cannot be excluded that the error was determinative of the content of the administrative decision in question c. information concerning factual circumstances unknown at the time the case was decided indicates a strong likelihood that the administrative decision would have been different.
a. for a reason that was rejected when the case was processed b. for a reason the parties should have cited during the ordinary processing of the case, in proceedings before the district court or in an application for reinstatement c. if it is highly likely that rehearing the case will not result in a change of significance to the applicant.